| BLOG
The Illinois Prejudgment Interest Statute: Is It Unconstitutional?

On May 28, 2021, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed an amendment to 735 ILCS 5/2-103 allowing for prejudgment interest of 6% for personal injury cases. Since that time, Illinois attorneys have pondered how best to navigate these new waters and how exactly this amendment will impact their clients going forward. In response to the amendment, many legal defense committees drafted a variety of motions and other pleadings that attacked the constitutionality of the amendment. Every county in Illinois has approached these issues differently. Depending on the county, some judges have entered and continued motions until the time of trial, while other judges have entered briefing schedules to address the issues in real time.

In Cook County, Judge Marcia Maras was initially tasked with ruling on the constitutionality of the amendment. On May 28, 2022, she entered an order finding the amendment unconstitutional and invalid based on the right of trial by jury and the prohibition against special legislation. (The complete May 28, 2022, order is available here: Hyland, et al. v. Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation, et al., 17 L 3541).

As of July, Cook County’s Law Division issued a notice advising that any prejudgment interest-related motions may be filed but shall remain pending until all avenues of appellate review on the constitutionality of the Act have been exhausted and a final order from the Illinois Supreme Court is issued. In cases assigned for trial though, those motions are to remain and be decided by the trial judge. Since that time, trial judges in Cook County have upheld the constitutionality of the statute and assessed prejudgment interest on verdicts. (See, Ahearn v. Heliotis, 18 L 3552; and Browning, et al. v. Advocate Health and Hospital Corp., et al., 16 L 6592).

The Takeaway

To date, this issue has not been reviewed by an appellate court. Cook County trial judges, though, appear to be upholding the constitutionality of the prejudgment interest statute. HeplerBroom will continue to monitor the entry of these trial orders and keep you informed as to developments.

  • Katie F.  Vinge
    Associate

    Katie Fulara Vinge defends clients in civil litigation, with a focus on construction injury and defect and professional liability. Her clients appreciate both her advocacy and her pragmatic approach in order to best frame a defense ...

Search Blog

Categories

Archives

Contact

Kerri Forsythe
618.307.1150
Email

Jump to Page

HeplerBroom LLC Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek