Court Denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Action Certification
A recent federal court ruling has significant implications for gender discrimination claims in academia, as it denied class action certification to a former faculty member of Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. The plaintiff alleged systemic wage discrimination, raising critical questions about equity in educational institutions. With HeplerBroom partner Thomas Wilson leading the defense, this case highlights the complexities of employment law and the challenges faced by individuals seeking justice. Discover the details of this landmark decision and what it means for future claims of discrimination in the workplace.
Fowler and Zaffiri Obtain Defense Verdict in St. Louis County Trial
In a recent St. Louis County trial, attorneys Meg Fowler and Brad Zaffiri achieved a significant defense verdict for their insurance broker client. The case revolved around a manufacturer who fell victim to a sophisticated spear phishing attack, resulting in a staggering loss of over $100,000. When the plaintiff sought coverage under their insurance policy, the carrier denied the claim, leading to a lawsuit against both the insurer and the broker. Discover how the jury’s swift decision highlighted the importance of clear communication and understanding in insurance coverage. Read on to uncover the trial’s compelling details and implications for the industry.
Tiffany and Rein Obtain Summary Judgement in $92 Million Construction Case
In a significant legal victory, Aleen Tiffany and Jamie Rein achieved summary judgment in a high-stakes $92 million construction lawsuit stemming from a 2014 stacker reclaimer collapse. The court’s ruling dismissed claims against the electrical contractor, affirming that all wiring was executed correctly and that the contractor bore no design obligations. This case highlights the complexities of multi-party commercial construction litigation, showcasing Tiffany and Rein’s expertise in navigating extensive documentation and securing crucial admissions from key personnel. Discover how their dedication and legal acumen led to this remarkable outcome in the face of challenging circumstances.
Hay and Brandabur Secure Another Defense Verdict in Malpractice Trial
In a remarkable legal triumph, HeplerBroom attorneys Linda Hay and Matthew Brandabur achieved a complete defense victory for a dentist in a challenging malpractice trial. The case centered around a 19-year-old plaintiff who claimed to have suffered a serious nerve injury following her wisdom teeth removal. Despite the plaintiff’s allegations and the undeniable evidence of her condition, the jury was not convinced of the dentist’s negligence. Discover how Hay and Brandabur’s expertise in professional liability cases led to this significant win and what it means for the future of medical malpractice litigation.
Hay and Brandabur Secure Defense Verdict in Malpractice Trial
In a significant legal triumph, HeplerBroom attorneys Linda Hay and Matthew Brandabur achieved a complete defense victory for a periodontist accused of malpractice. The case revolved around a plaintiff who claimed that a dental implant was improperly placed, resulting in debilitating pain and numbness. Despite the plaintiff’s attorneys seeking a staggering $2.3 million in damages, the jury was not convinced of the periodontist’s negligence. Discover how Hay and Brandabur’s expertise in professional liability cases led to this remarkable outcome in the courtroom, showcasing their dedication and skill in defending their client against serious allegations.
Missouri Court of Appeals Reverses and Vacates Judgment in Case Claiming that Talc Caused Plaintiff’s Ovarian Cancer
In a significant legal development, the Missouri Court of Appeals has reversed a staggering $72 million judgment in the case of Fox v. Johnson & Johnson, citing a lack of personal jurisdiction. This ruling stems from the U.S. Supreme Court’s precedent, raising critical questions about where plaintiffs can file lawsuits. With Ms. Fox hailing from Alabama and joining forces with other plaintiffs in St. Louis, the appellate court’s decision underscores the complexities of jurisdictional law. Discover the implications of this ruling and its potential impact on future cases involving personal jurisdiction. Read more to delve into the details!
Kaufmann and Champlin Secure Defense Verdict in St. Clair County Jury Trial
In a recent St. Clair County jury trial, attorneys Stephen R. Kaufmann and Matthew B. Champlin achieved a significant defense verdict, showcasing their expertise in the courtroom. The case revolved around allegations against Securitas security guards at a Schnucks pharmacy, accused of unjustly tackling and handcuffing a plaintiff. With Kaufmann’s impressive track record in both state and federal courts and Champlin’s focus on complex litigation, their combined skills led to a swift jury decision. Discover how their dedication and legal acumen turned the tide in this high-stakes trial. Read on to learn more about this compelling case!
Hay and Wagener Secure Defense Verdict in Medical Malpractice/Long-Term Care Trial
In a landmark medical malpractice trial, HeplerBroom attorneys Linda Hay and Susan Wagener achieved a complete defense victory for their client, an internal medicine physician, after a three-week courtroom battle. The case involved a tragic death during rehabilitation at ManorCare, with $17 million in damages sought by the plaintiff. This outcome underscores the defense team’s skill and represents a rare success in trials involving physicians and long-term care facilities. Discover the details behind this significant verdict!
Hammond and DuChateau Help Create Favorable New Law in a Case of First Impression
In a landmark ruling, partners Rick Hammond and Jim DuChateau successfully defended Ohio Security Insurance Co. against a breach of contract lawsuit, setting a new precedent in Illinois law. The case involved a hail damage claim where the insured attempted to challenge a fully-paid appraisal award nearly two years after the loss. The court’s decision, which affirmed the binding nature of appraisal awards, not only dismissed the lawsuit but also reversed a 20-year trend allowing policyholders to seek further claims post-appraisal. Discover how this pivotal case reshapes the landscape of insurance disputes and protects insurers’ rights.
Moch Argues Case before Illinois Supreme Court
On March 15, 2017, Eric W. Moch, a prominent partner in the Chicago office, took center stage at the Illinois Supreme Court, representing Pi Kappa Alpha International Fraternity in a pivotal case. This landmark legal battle, stemming from a tragic alcohol-related incident at Northern Illinois University, challenges the very foundations of social host liability law in Illinois and the Hazing Act’s implications. As the court deliberates, the stakes are high for the fraternity and its members. Discover the intricacies of this case and watch Moch’s compelling argument unfold in a video available online.