Reda and Harriss Publish Article on Ensuring Admissibility of Social Media Evidence

Article Details

Published:

Read Time:

1 min read

Follow Us:

Associated Attorney(s)

Michael Reda
As the head of HeplerBroom’s 24-hour Emergency Response Team, Michael Reda knows what it takes to defend commercial trucking companies and their drivers. His calm presence helps diffuse the adrenaline that can be present at accident sites, and his ability to quickly gather the right investigators and accident reconstruction experts to the scene can be crucial in crafting a defense. He’s also experienced in handling the variety of claims plaintiffs' attorneys will make, encompassing everything from last-mile delivery to vehicle infotainment system data and negligent, hiring, training, and supervision claims.

Share this Article

Partner Michael Reda and associate attorney Michael Harriss provided readers of In Transit (the newsletter of the Trucking Law Committee of DRI) with an overview of typical foundational requirements to ensure that social media evidence is admissible.

Reda and Harriss laid out a theoretical background for applying Federal Rules of Evidence to the authentication of social media evidence, followed by a discussion of how courts have applied those Rules in actual practice. Finally, they delineated how to use the Tools of Discovery in the authentication process, including potential questions to use during depositions. Reda and Harriss emphasized the importance of securing information about an entire social-media account rather than relying on only cherry-picked posts or photographs.

You can read the full article (“Plaintiff Posted What? Ensuring that Social Media Diamonds are Admissible by Addressing the Foundational Requirements for Social Media Evidence”) here.

Related Articles