Wilson and Kosiba Secure Appellate Win for Charitable Beneficiaries of a Trust, Including Full Attorney Fees and Costs
In a significant ruling, the Illinois First District Appellate Court has upheld a Cook County trial court’s decision, granting full attorney fees and costs to charitable beneficiaries of a trust. This case arose after a nephew, acting as trustee, failed to distribute funds as required, leading to a lawsuit by the beneficiaries. The appellate court not only affirmed the beneficiaries’ right to summary judgment but also condemned the trustee’s “egregious misconduct,” ensuring that the charities received the full compensation they deserved. Discover how this landmark decision impacts trust law and the rights of beneficiaries.
Nielsen Scores Second Defense Victory in August
In a significant legal victory, Mary Nielsen secured a defense verdict for an optometry store in Lake County, Illinois. The plaintiff claimed an injury from concealed fireplace plinth and eyeglass displays, but the jury ruled in favor of the store in under an hour. This case highlights the complexities of premises liability and the need for a strong legal defense.
Weiner and Jansen Secure Dismissal of False Arrest Claim for Illinois Municipality
In a significant legal victory, attorneys Stephanie Weiner and Sarah Jansen achieved a dismissal with prejudice for an Illinois municipality in a false arrest claim stemming from a 2018 incident. The court’s ruling emphasized the importance of the two-year statute of limitations, which the plaintiff failed to respect by filing his lawsuit in August 2023. This case highlights the critical nature of timely legal action and showcases the expertise of Weiner and Jansen in navigating complex municipal law. Discover how their innovative approaches and extensive experience led to this decisive outcome.
Nielsen and Caldwell Successfully Defend Cook County Hospital Against Negligence Claim
In a significant legal victory, attorneys Mary Nielsen and Chelsea Caldwell successfully defended a Cook County hospital against a negligence claim that could have set a troubling precedent for healthcare providers. The case revolved around an independently contracted ophthalmologist accused of failing to recommend critical treatment for a patient’s central retinal artery occlusion. With a compelling argument, Nielsen and Caldwell demonstrated that the ophthalmologist was not the hospital’s apparent agent, leading to a directed verdict just before the trial’s conclusion. Discover how their expertise in medical malpractice defense played a crucial role in this landmark case.
Banasek and Boeckman Secure Summary Judgment on Hospital COVID Negligence Suit
In a significant legal victory, attorneys Tammy Banasek and LaDonna Boeckman have secured a partial summary judgment for a hospital in a COVID-19 negligence lawsuit, leveraging Illinois Governor Pritzker’s Executive Order 2020-19. This order grants immunity to healthcare providers who assisted during the pandemic. The case involved a plaintiff who developed a sacral wound during hospitalization, alleging negligence and willful misconduct. Discover how the court’s ruling underscores the importance of legal protections for healthcare institutions during unprecedented times and learn more about the impressive credentials of Banasek and Boeckman in the realm of medical malpractice defense.
Reda and Suddarth Obtain Dismissal with Prejudice for Public Water District
Michael Reda and Matthew Suddarth recently achieved a significant legal victory by securing a dismissal with prejudice for a Madison County public water district and its employee. The case, rooted in allegations of negligence stemming from a 2021 incident, hinged on the critical one-year statute of limitations outlined in the Illinois Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act. Despite the plaintiff’s attempts to challenge the dismissal, including a Motion for Reconsideration, the court upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the broad protections afforded by the Act. Discover how this case highlights the complexities of tort litigation and governmental immunity.
HeplerBroom Attorney Wins $2.9 Million Award for Tennis Coach in a Defamation Lawsuit
In a landmark defamation case, attorney Lance Jones secured a stunning $2.9 million award for his client, Brian Holzgrafe, a tennis coach wrongfully accused of misconduct. The saga began in 2017 when a rumor spread by a student at Quincy University tarnished Holzgrafe’s reputation. Despite a university investigation clearing him, the damage was done, leading to a fierce legal battle. With the jury’s decisive verdict, Holzgrafe’s fight for justice culminated in a significant victory. Discover the details of this compelling case and the implications it holds for defamation law.
Bauer and Suddarth Obtain Dismissal of Greenwashing Class Action
In a significant legal victory, attorneys Beth Bauer and Matthew Suddarth, alongside their team from Weil Gotschal, successfully secured a dismissal of a class action lawsuit against a prominent sportswear manufacturer accused of greenwashing. The plaintiff alleged deceptive practices regarding the use of recycled materials in thousands of products, but the court found the claims insufficient. This case highlights the complexities of consumer protection laws and the importance of substantiating allegations in court. Discover how Bauer and Suddarth navigated this challenging litigation and the implications for future greenwashing claims in the industry.
Davis and Insler Secure Summary Judgment in Accountant Professional Liability Case
In a significant legal victory, Glenn Davis and Charles Insler have secured summary judgment for a national accounting firm in a high-stakes professional liability case. The firm faced a lawsuit from a bank over a $3.5 million loan default, with claims of professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation. The Circuit Court’s decision to send one claim to arbitration and dismiss the other highlights the complexities of legal accountability in the accounting profession. Discover how Davis and Insler navigated this challenging case and the implications for professionals in the industry.
Bousquet and Roman Secure Appellate Court Decision on Contract Dispute over Right of First Refusal
In a significant legal victory, Bousquet and Roman successfully overturned a trial court’s decision in a contentious contract dispute over a Right of First Refusal in Iron County, Missouri. After the landowner’s refusal to sell part of the land, the ROFR holders initiated a lawsuit, leading to a complex legal battle. With their expertise, Bousquet and Roman crafted compelling appellate briefs that not only reversed the trial court’s ruling but also secured an award of reasonable attorney fees for the landowner. Discover how their combined experience and strategic approach made a difference in this high-stakes case.