Magee and Hamilton Prevail in Jury Trial
In a compelling jury trial, attorneys Tom Magee and Kat Hamilton secured a significant defense verdict for their client, St. Louis Cold Drawn, Inc. The case revolved around a personal injury claim filed by Walter Douglas, who alleged that a heavy spreader bar fell from an overhead crane, causing severe injuries that led to surgery and the loss of his trucking career. With the plaintiff seeking a staggering $1.6 million, the jury’s swift decision to rule in favor of St. Louis Cold Drawn, Inc. and award zero dollars is a striking testament to the strength of the defense’s case.
Varadachari Prevails on Motion for Summary Judgment
In a significant legal victory, Bharat Varadachari successfully secured a Motion for Summary Judgment on January 30, 2013, representing his client in a complex case stemming from a massive multi-car accident on Interstate 64. This incident, which involved over 40 vehicles, posed numerous challenges and legal intricacies. Varadachari’s expertise and strategic approach not only highlighted the complexities of the case but also underscored his commitment to achieving justice for his client. Discover how this landmark decision unfolded and what it means for those affected by the accident in the bustling City of St. Louis.
Kaufmann and Murphy Prevail on Motion for Summary Judgment
In a significant legal victory, attorneys Stephen R. Kaufmann and Michael P. Murphy of HeplerBroom’s Springfield office successfully secured a motion for summary judgment in a challenging slip-and-fall case. The plaintiff claimed injuries from a fall on ice and snow, but the court ruled in favor of the defendant, citing the natural accumulation rule. This case highlights the complexities of premises liability and the importance of understanding local laws regarding weather-related incidents. Discover how this ruling could impact future cases and what it means for property owners and legal practitioners alike. Read on for more insights!
Noce and Mueller Obtain Defense Verdict for Client
In a compelling legal battle, attorneys Gerard Noce and Amanda Mueller secured a significant defense verdict for their client, a law firm accused of breach of fiduciary duty. The case revolved around a decedent’s Trust and a former home health employee who claimed the firm improperly took funds intended for her. With a demand of $250,000 on the table, the trial saw Noce and Mueller successfully dismissing key claims, ultimately leading to a jury verdict in favor of the defendant. Discover how this intricate case unfolded and the implications of the jury’s decision.
Fowler Obtains Favorable Verdict for Insurance Client
In a compelling legal battle, Meg Fowler secured a defense verdict for Insurance Store, Inc. in St. Louis County, showcasing her expertise in navigating complex insurance disputes. The case revolved around a client whose two cars were repossessed, leading him to blame his insurance agent for alleged negligence and fraud. However, the trial revealed a different story—evidence showed the client was fully aware of his insurance coverage and that his own actions contributed to the repossessions. Discover how Fowler’s strategic defense turned the tide in this high-stakes trial and what it means for the insurance industry.
Fowler Obtains Favorable Verdict for Client
In a surprising turn of events, attorney Meg Fowler secured a verdict in the challenging case of Deering v. Cutkomp. The plaintiff, who suffered serious injuries including two herniated discs and a bicep tear after being rear-ended on Highway 270, sought $175,000 in damages. However, the jury’s decision shocked many, awarding only $132.60—the exact amount of the emergency room bill. What led to such a stark contrast between the plaintiff’s demands and the jury’s verdict? Dive into the details of this intriguing case and discover the complexities of personal injury law that shaped this outcome.
Kaufmann and Murphy Secure Dismissal with Prejudice in Federal Court
In a significant legal victory, attorneys Stephen R. Kaufmann and Michael P. Murphy from HeplerBroom’s Springfield office have successfully secured a dismissal with prejudice for the City of Pekin and its officials. This case, which involved serious allegations of civil rights violations under federal law, highlights the complexities of legal battles in today’s society. The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois granted the motion to dismiss, marking a pivotal moment for the defendants. Discover the details behind this landmark decision and what it means for civil rights litigation in the region.
Kaufmann and Murphy Win Appeal in Third District
In a significant victory for HeplerBroom’s Springfield office, attorneys Stephen R. Kaufmann and Michael P. Murphy successfully navigated an appeal in the Illinois Appellate Court for the Third District. Their efforts led to the affirmation of a dismissal with prejudice in the notable case of Simmons v. The City of Pekin, et al. This outcome not only underscores the expertise of Kaufmann and Murphy but also highlights the importance of skilled legal representation in complex appellate matters. Discover the details of this compelling case and the implications of the court’s decision by reading the full opinion.
Bozarth Obtains Favorable Opinion in Illinois Appellate Court
In a significant legal victory, HeplerBroom attorney Troy Bozarth has secured a favorable opinion from the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, in the case of Lightspeed Media Corp. v. AT&T Internet Services, et al. This ruling not only highlights the expertise of Bozarth but also sets a precedent in the realm of internet services and media rights. Curious about the implications of this decision and what it means for similar cases? Dive into the details of the opinion and discover how this ruling could impact the landscape of digital media and telecommunications. Read more here!
Noce, Assouad and Deterding Win Summary Judgment for School District in Sexual Abuse Suit
In a significant legal victory, attorneys Gerard T. Noce, Justin L. Assouad, and David J. Deterding successfully secured summary judgment for the Wentzville R-IV School District in a federal lawsuit involving serious allegations of sexual abuse. The case, brought forth by plaintiff Mary Doe Nine, centered around claims against a former music teacher dating back to 1993. After a thorough examination, the court determined that there was insufficient evidence to suggest that the school district had any knowledge of potential danger posed by the teacher. Discover the details of this pivotal ruling and its implications for the district.