Hepler, Bauer, Speciale, and Kuchar Defeat Plaintiffs’ Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in Multi-Million Dollar Claim

Article Details

Published:

Read Time:

2 min read

Related Practice Areas:

Follow Us:

Associated Attorney(s)

Beth A. Bauer
Whether representing Fortune 50 companies in high-stakes class or mass actions or a local non-profit needing help, Beth A. Bauer balances creative, tenacious advocacy with a calm, commanding demeanor. Clients benefit from her experience as an appellate clerk and practitioner as she strategizes from a broad perspective and gains intricate understanding of the details that make the difference.
Tara W. Kuchar
Tara W. Kuchar maintains a diverse law practice. She regularly defends nursing homes and assisted living facilities, premises and manufacturers in products liability claims, and employers confronting allegations of wrongful conduct from employees. Her practice, however, extends beyond litigation. She also provides counsel to businesses in a wide range of employment-related issues.
Larry E. Hepler
Larry E. Hepler focuses his practice on the defense of complex, multiparty civil cases and class actions involving a wide range of subjects, including all aspects of consumer fraud, personal injury, products liability, pharmaceutical, commercial, toxic torts, construction, and insurance litigation. He has represented clients in numerous jurisdictions, with a primary emphasis in Illinois and Missouri.

Share this Article

In late 2010, Larry Hepler, Beth Bauer, Andrew Speciale, and Tara Kuchar, won a defense verdict on all counts for Southcap Pipeline Company in a case filed by Valero Marketing and Supply Company and The Premcor Refining Group, Inc. in the Southern District of Illinois. The Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendant failed to return over 400,000 barrels of crude oil to the Plaintiffs in violation of the Interstate Commerce Act. Further, the Plaintiffs contended Southcap violated its own tariff. Plaintiffs sought the value of the barrels of oil, which under various calculations was multiple millions of dollars, or a declaratory judgment that Southcap provide over 400,000 barrels of crude oil to the Plaintiffs. The trial team established that the Plaintiffs failed to show they were entitled to any of the 400,000 barrels of crude oil or their equivalent monetary value. The Honorable Donald G. Wilkerson decided the case and found Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that they were entitled to any of the claimed barrels of oil.

Recently, the trial court denied Plaintiffs’ motion to alter or amend the judgment to award them the alleged barrels based on their claim that Southcap violated the ICA by unfairly discriminating against Plaintiffs in allocating the entire purported loss to Plaintiffs. Alternatively, Plaintiffs sought a partial award of approximately 110,000 barrels on another theory. Beth Bauer and Larry Hepler submitted briefing on both points, arguing that Plaintiffs neither preserved these arguments at trial nor had they presented any new evidence to show they were entitled to any additional barrels for any reason. In denying the Plaintiffs’ motion, the trial court reiterated its findings that Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate they were entitled to any additional barrels, regardless of the theory.

Related Articles