Noce, Mueller, and Deterding Prevail in Appeal in Eighth Circuit

Article Details

Published:

Read Time:

1 min read

Related Practice Areas:

Follow Us:

Associated Attorney(s)

Amanda M. Mueller
Amanda Mueller’s goal as an attorney is to assist people and businesses in protecting themselves during the litigation process by helping them navigate what can sometimes be stressful and unfamiliar territory. Clients are offered potential courses of action that range from aggressive to pragmatic, depending on their needs, and each option is carefully discussed and approached in a manner that ensures they fully understand the issues at hand. Her trademark candor and frank assessment of the options and solutions available in each individual’s circumstance are key to her success in resolving legal conflicts and generating trust between lawyer and client. Her clients are assured they are an integral part of the defense team and decision-making process.

Share this Article

Gerard Noce, Amanda Mueller and David Deterding represented the Logan-Rogersville R-VIII Public School District and its former high school principal, John Hetherington, in the case of Adam Walker v. Bradley T. Barrett, Logan-Rogersville R-VIII School District and John Hetherington. This case was brought by Walker claiming that he had been sexually abused by defendant Barrett while Walker was a student enrolled in the district. All defendants filed motions to dismiss based upon the various Missouri Statutes of Limitations. The motions were sustained and the plaintiff appealed to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The plaintiff claimed on appeal that the statute of limitations contained within the Missouri Childhood Sexual Abuse Statute (RSMo 537.046) applied not only to the individual defendant perpetrator (Walker), but also applied to claims against the non-perpetrator defendants, i.e.. the school district and high school principal. The Eighth Circuit in affirming the dismissal held that 537.046 does not apply to the non-perpetrator defendants. Plaintiff sought a rehearing and a hearing by the Eighth Circuit Court en banc. Both of those motions were denied. This is the first court of record to actually rule on this particular issue which often comes up in sexual abuse cases where plaintiffs attempt to hold the perpetrator’s employer or some other institution liable for the actions of the perpetrator. Click here to view the Order.

Related Articles